LAGOS ā Crisis appears to be looming in the nationās troubled power sector over the Federal GovĀernmentās granting of an independent electricity disĀtribution network licence to Asaba Distribution Limited.
We gathĀered that the development may be connected with moves by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) to break the regional monopoly of electricity disĀtribution companies which has continued to hamper serĀvice delivery to customers in the country.
It is being feared in some quarters that the new move would result in legal fireĀworks among NERC, Benin Electricity Distribution ComĀpany (BEDC), and Asaba DisĀtribution Limited.
BEDC is responsible for retail distribution of electricĀity in Delta, Edo, Ekiti, and Ondo states with geographiĀcal coverage of 55,770 square kilometres.
Already, BEDC, whose moĀnopoly is being threatened, has filed a petition before NERC to challenge the grantĀing of licence to the new enĀtrant.
NERC has fixed tomorrow for hearing of the petition against the granting of an Independent Electricity DisĀtribution Network Licence to Asaba Distribution Limited pursuant to Section 70 (2) of the Electric Power Sector ReĀform Act (EPSRA).
The commission said the hearing is also pursuant to clause 11 of the NERC ApĀplication for Licences ReguĀlations 2010, and section 17 of NERC (Business Rules of the Commission) Regulations (Business Rules) 2006.
ALSO READ: Buhari, Osinbajo, Others Lay Wreaths To Mark Armed Forces Remembrance Day
A reliable source in the power sector told Daily InĀdependent that a crisis was in the offing over the licence granted to Asaba Distribution Limited.
He said: āYou see, NERC is calling for a crisis in the sector if it goes ahead with this Asaba DisCo instead of considering the refranchising of the eleven DisCos.
āThis means everyone they issue a licence, there will be a petition, so expect eleven peĀtitions if they go on like this.
āI have seen no sincerity in the entire case. This is a hearing to a petition by an affected party, so attention is only to the Benin DisCo in the hearing.
āThe question is, did NERC conduct a public hearing beĀfore issuing the licence to AsaĀba DisCo?
āSo, where is the sincerity in addressing the problem of power here?
āI agree with you that it should be for all the DisCos, why only Benin DisCo?
āIt looks like punishment. I donāt think the public will be entertained here or should be entertained at all since it is only Benin DisCo that peĀtitioned as an affected party.
āThe next action here will be a court case, I assure you.ā
Adeola Samuel, a power expert, reasoned that many times the DisCos have vioĀlated the performance agreeĀment without consequences.
He told Daily Independent that the review of the agreeĀment was due after five years with the proviso for one more year extension, which expired in 2019, but NERC still failed to act.
He added that by virtue of that agreement and clause, the acceptance of Asaba DisĀCo may be due to a review of the performance of BeĀnin Electricity Distribution Company, which is below par, hence the entry of another company.
He said it was not out of place if Benin DisCo was singled out for such perforĀmance review as the inciĀdents in the area are louder in low delivery than any othĀer DisCos.
He said: āA town in Ondo State has been without light for years even before the adĀvent of Benin DisCo yet such a company did not bother to exploit the situation for expansion, instead they emĀbarked on humongous billĀings of consumers with no correspondence supply.
āAn Edo civil society orĀganisation has been at loggerĀheads with them all this while without making any progress at meeting their yearning.
āThe governor had to send their management out of the state governorās office at a point when they came to reĀmind him of owing without addressing the non-perforĀmance that had characterised their service delivery.
āIf Asaba Distribution Company can break their monopoly, so be it?
āFrom all electricity conĀsumersā protection forums, we support any move that can bring about better service delivery.
āAfter all, Benin DisCo was not asked to pack up; itās the franchise area that would be divided.
āMaybe they even forgot that each company is a leĀgal entity. The performance agreement was signed and accepted by each manageĀment of the DisCos not colĀlectively.
āSo, each DisCo bears its name when push comes to shove. When IBEDC manageĀment was sanctioned for misĀmanaging the loan obtained, did any other DisCo complain of not being included.
āWhen four DisCos obeyed the capping method and the other seven were given an intention letter to sanction them, did the other four comĀplain?
āSo, each company is subĀject to the rule of engagement and performance agreement as a legal entity, not as a class entity.ā
A stakeholder in the power sector, who craved anonymity, emphasised the need for comĀpetition in the nationās power sector.
āWe canāt continue like this. To us, something isnāt adding up. It is most disheartĀening and embarrassing, to say the least, if something is not working optimally.
āThe way forward is to do a mid-term review of the entire privatisation exercise.
āThere is a need to bring all the issues to the table. The present arrangement is badĀly skewed and badly crafted such that even if we remain on the same trajectories for 10 years, the national goals and policy objectives of Nigeria in the power sector will be that of an auto pilot.
āNERC has done well by opening its doors to this novel and noble cause.
āLetās test extant rules which will be a learning curve for the electricity ecosystem and strengthen the regulatory landscape.ā
Kunle Olubiyo, the presiĀdent, Nigeria Consumer ProĀtection Network, told Daily Independent that there was need for urgent review of the power sector privatisation exĀercise, saying that no agreeĀment was expected to be cast in stone.
According to him, āIs the moratorium of exclusivity of market monopoly unwittingĀly granted to the 11 electricĀity distribution companies designed to be till thy KingĀdom come, perpetual, or was it designed to be an eternally irrevocable licence?ā