Kogi State and 18 other states tried to get the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offenses Commission (ICPC), and the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) ruled illegal by the Supreme Court of Nigeria. The court did not accept their case. The people who filed the lawsuit said that these organizations were made in a way that was against the 1999 Constitution. In particular, they said that the EFCC could not be created without the approval of a majority of state Houses of Assembly, which is what the constitution says must happen in order to ratify certain foreign agreements or treaties.
But the Supreme Court said these claims were not valid and that the EFCC and the bodies that work with it were legal under the Constitution. The EFCC Establishment Act was passed by the National Assembly in 2002, so the court said that the state governments did not need to accept it. The judge made it clear that the act was a domestic law and that it was made through the right parliamentary processes. The court said that all federating states in Nigeria must follow domestic laws passed by the National Assembly, but not foreign treaties, which may need approval from each state. In this case, the EFCC was created as an anti-corruption agency by the National Assembly under its constitutional power to deal with national problems. The agency’s work did not interfere with the state assemblies’ powers.
The Supreme Court’s decision also made it clearer what the difference is between rules and conventions. The court said that a foreign treaty or convention might need to be ratified by all the states, but the EFCC Act was made by the National Assembly and did not need to be ratified by all the states. So, the court challenge that said the EFCC’s creation went against Section 12 of the Constitution was thrown out.
The main question of the case was whether the EFCC and other related agencies, such as the ICPC and NFIU, were set up according to the rules set out in the 1999 Constitution. This was especially true when it came to the approval of laws by the state Houses of Assembly. The plaintiffs said that these agencies were created because Nigeria was committed to international agreements like the UN Convention Against Corruption. They said that these agreements should have been approved by state governments in line with Section 12. Plaintiffs said that because the EFCC and the other agencies didn’t follow this process, their acts were against the law and the Constitution.
The Attorney General of the Federation, speaking for the federal government, said that these claims were false and that the creation of the EFCC did not violate the Constitution. The government said that the National Assembly was the only body authorized by the constitution to make laws about setting up anti-corruption agencies. They also said that the EFCC was a real federal agency whose job it was to fight corruption and financial crimes across the country. The Attorney General also said that the plaintiffs had the wrong idea about what the EFCC Act was. He said that it was a law passed by the National Assembly and not a foreign agreement or treaty.
The court’s ruling also affected a more general legal principle: federal law is the most important when it comes to national issues. The court said that corruption and financial crimes are problems that affect more than one state and need a coordinated response. The court said again that in a federal system like Nigeria’s, states have a lot of freedom, but they can’t go against or overturn laws made by the National Assembly that are meant to protect the whole country. This principle supports the laws that allow government agencies that fight corruption to do their jobs.
The Supreme Court’s decision successfully protects the continued operation of the EFCC, ICPC, and NFIU, which are important to Nigeria’s fight against corruption. These organizations were made to deal with the growing issue of graft, money laundering, and other financial crimes that hurt the country’s economy and government. By confirming the legitimacy of these organizations, the Supreme Court has made sure that they can continue to do their jobs without state governments getting in the way.
It also changes the balance of power between Nigeria’s federal and state governments in a bigger way. Nigeria is a federal republic, which means that some powers are shared between the federal government and the states. However, the court’s ruling makes it clear that federal laws are the most important when it comes to issues that affect the whole country. The decision strengthens the role of federal agencies in protecting the country from corruption, financial crimes, and other threats to national security.
The Supreme Court’s decision to throw out the suit also shows how hard it is to fight crime in Nigeria, both legally and politically. It’s possible that some state governments are against these attempts because they want to weaken the power of federal agencies for political or institutional reasons. So, the court’s decision is seen as an important step toward making sure that the fight against corruption doesn’t get slowed down by legal challenges from states that want to weaken government efforts to fight corruption.
Additionally, the decision is a big win for the federal government because it makes the EFCC and other similar agencies stronger legally. Nigeria still has a lot of problems with corruption and financial crimes. This decision makes sure that the country’s anti-corruption agencies can keep working all over the country and hold people and businesses responsible for illegal financial activities.
This decision is not only a legal win, but it is also a big step forward in Nigeria’s fight against crime. By upholding the EFCC’s legitimacy, the Supreme Court has shown that it is committed to the rule of law and accountability. This makes it clear that it will be hard for people to question the authority of anti-corruption agencies. The choice also shows how important it is to have a single set of laws when dealing with complicated problems like corruption that need the help of everyone in the government.
ALSO READ:
NEWS FLASH: The NJC Says That Two Judges Should Be Retired And Suspends Two Others
